Tom Box tbox-7i5HoP2kWQc@public.gmane.org [Canadian-Passenger-Rail]
2014-09-22 01:44:34 UTC
A story in the Ottawa Citizen reports that VIA spent $1.72
million dollars in 2013 on buses, taxis, etc. to get passengers
to their destinations. <http://ow.ly/BKspU>
The story is headlined "Via Rail paid its competitors nearly
$2 million last year", and includes a comment from a Greyhound
spokesperson, but I wonder how much of that amount really went
to operators of scheduled bus routes or airlines, which I
would consider VIA's direct competitors. The last couple of
times I've been bustituted, it wasn't on a Greyhound or
Megabus, but on a bus from a small charter operator, which
I wouldn't call a competitor of VIA. As the story mentions
in passing, some of the replacement transport is by taxi.
Again, I wouldn't call that a competitor of VIA.
The cost to VIA was higher than in the four previous years.
The story notes that the rail accident rate has been
declining over the same time period. I'm not sure there's
anything paradoxical there. Passenger trains are a small
fraction of the total traffic on the rails, and serious
accidents are (fortunately) rare events, so it's very
possible that the number of accidents affecting VIA
(freight derailments, grade crossing collisions, etc.)
could easily increase in one year at the same time the
overall accident rate was declining, just through random
fluctuation.
One should also note that not all of the substitute transport
is a result of accidents. Missed connections are another
reason for sending passengers onward by bus or taxi.
Tom Box
tbox at ncf dot ca
Port Hope, ON, Canada
------------------------------------
Posted by: Tom Box <tbox-***@public.gmane.org>
------------------------------------
For help, send an email to Canadian-Passenger-Rail-help-***@public.gmane.org
million dollars in 2013 on buses, taxis, etc. to get passengers
to their destinations. <http://ow.ly/BKspU>
The story is headlined "Via Rail paid its competitors nearly
$2 million last year", and includes a comment from a Greyhound
spokesperson, but I wonder how much of that amount really went
to operators of scheduled bus routes or airlines, which I
would consider VIA's direct competitors. The last couple of
times I've been bustituted, it wasn't on a Greyhound or
Megabus, but on a bus from a small charter operator, which
I wouldn't call a competitor of VIA. As the story mentions
in passing, some of the replacement transport is by taxi.
Again, I wouldn't call that a competitor of VIA.
The cost to VIA was higher than in the four previous years.
The story notes that the rail accident rate has been
declining over the same time period. I'm not sure there's
anything paradoxical there. Passenger trains are a small
fraction of the total traffic on the rails, and serious
accidents are (fortunately) rare events, so it's very
possible that the number of accidents affecting VIA
(freight derailments, grade crossing collisions, etc.)
could easily increase in one year at the same time the
overall accident rate was declining, just through random
fluctuation.
One should also note that not all of the substitute transport
is a result of accidents. Missed connections are another
reason for sending passengers onward by bus or taxi.
Tom Box
tbox at ncf dot ca
Port Hope, ON, Canada
------------------------------------
Posted by: Tom Box <tbox-***@public.gmane.org>
------------------------------------
For help, send an email to Canadian-Passenger-Rail-help-***@public.gmane.org